<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Pays To Be Handy&#8230;Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/</link>
	<description>RV Campground &#38; Camping Information - RV, Motorhome, Camper, Travel Trailer &#38; 5th Wheel Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:54:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dianne</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/23/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Bert, if you will read the comment above, I stated that the fiver weighed over 16,5000# which was marginal for a &#039;99 F450.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert, if you will read the comment above, I stated that the fiver weighed over 16,5000# which was marginal for a &#8216;99 F450.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert &#38; Odette Therrien</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert &#38; Odette Therrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/23/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>This is the second article I&#039;ve read (Fulltiming - What’s that?
January 17th, 2008 by Dianne O&#039;Keeffe) where the author states their truck wasn&#039;t big enough.  I&#039;m wondering how much their Fiver weighed for it to require them to purchase a heavier duty truck.  I had a 35&#039; 9&quot;, 2003 Newmar Kountry Star Fiver which grossed @ 16,200 pounds loaded, and I pulled it 1st with a Chevy Dually 1 Ton Heavy Duty, 454 CI, then with a Ford  F350 Dually 6.0 Turbo Diesel Heavy Duty.  I never had any problems towing with either one. Both trucks had plenty of power for hills, but the Diesel more so than gas of course. Although I never weighed our unit, I estimate I pulled it at approximately 14,500 to 15,000 pounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second article I&#8217;ve read (Fulltiming &#8211; What’s that?<br />
January 17th, 2008 by Dianne O&#8217;Keeffe) where the author states their truck wasn&#8217;t big enough.  I&#8217;m wondering how much their Fiver weighed for it to require them to purchase a heavier duty truck.  I had a 35&#8242; 9&#8243;, 2003 Newmar Kountry Star Fiver which grossed @ 16,200 pounds loaded, and I pulled it 1st with a Chevy Dually 1 Ton Heavy Duty, 454 CI, then with a Ford  F350 Dually 6.0 Turbo Diesel Heavy Duty.  I never had any problems towing with either one. Both trucks had plenty of power for hills, but the Diesel more so than gas of course. Although I never weighed our unit, I estimate I pulled it at approximately 14,500 to 15,000 pounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianne</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/23/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>The fiver was a 35&#039; alfa that actually measured nearly 37&#039; It was heavy...GVRW over 16,5000#

The F450 was barely enough...especially the brakes.  We were not at all comfortable with &quot;adequate&quot;.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fiver was a 35&#8242; alfa that actually measured nearly 37&#8242; It was heavy&#8230;GVRW over 16,5000#</p>
<p>The F450 was barely enough&#8230;especially the brakes.  We were not at all comfortable with &#8220;adequate&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sickle</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/02/23/it-pays-to-be-handypart-2/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Tell us some more about your rig combination. What 34&#039; fiver required you to get a truck BIGGER than an F-450?  

I&#039;d like to know primarily because I&#039;m heading fro retirement soon. I have a F-350 (non-dually) and a 36&#039; fiver. Now, while my combo seems to be satisfactory right now, I am a bit concerned when the time comes to start heading west into the HIGH lands. I&#039;m an east coaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us some more about your rig combination. What 34&#8242; fiver required you to get a truck BIGGER than an F-450?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know primarily because I&#8217;m heading fro retirement soon. I have a F-350 (non-dually) and a 36&#8242; fiver. Now, while my combo seems to be satisfactory right now, I am a bit concerned when the time comes to start heading west into the HIGH lands. I&#8217;m an east coaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

