<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Innovations Are Not Always Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/</link>
	<description>RV Campground &#38; Camping Information - RV, Motorhome, Camper, Travel Trailer &#38; 5th Wheel Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:13:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lug_Nut</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-78298</link>
		<dc:creator>Lug_Nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 00:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-78298</guid>
		<description>Well Bob,  I don&#039;t know, why don&#039;t you explain what you mean?  Life shouldn&#039;t be that serious.  Lighten up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Bob,  I don&#8217;t know, why don&#8217;t you explain what you mean?  Life shouldn&#8217;t be that serious.  Lighten up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-32955</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-32955</guid>
		<description>If one&#039;s secondary handle is doctor of mixology, then who could take his remarks seriously......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one&#8217;s secondary handle is doctor of mixology, then who could take his remarks seriously&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leisure Time Search &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Innovations in Generator Slides</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-17714</link>
		<dc:creator>Leisure Time Search &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Innovations in Generator Slides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-17714</guid>
		<description>[...] Having a movable section of the front cap that is that large, can present some new challenges.   If it is the entire piece from the windshield down, mirrors must be relocated as the movable section would prove unusable due to vibration issues.  This would mean going to the inverted upper mounted units.  That could raise all kinds of new issues.   See January 27th article &#8220;New Innovations Are Not Always Better&#8221;  LINK HERE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having a movable section of the front cap that is that large, can present some new challenges.   If it is the entire piece from the windshield down, mirrors must be relocated as the movable section would prove unusable due to vibration issues.  This would mean going to the inverted upper mounted units.  That could raise all kinds of new issues.   See January 27th article &#8220;New Innovations Are Not Always Better&#8221;  LINK HERE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovations in Generator Slides</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-17560</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovations in Generator Slides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-17560</guid>
		<description>[...] Having a movable section of the front cap that is that large, can present some new challenges.   If it is the entire piece from the windshield down, mirrors must be relocated as the movable section would prove unusable due to vibration issues.  This would mean going to the inverted upper mounted units.  That could raise all kinds of new issues.   See January 27th article &#8220;New Innovations Are Not Always Better&#8221;  LINK HERE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having a movable section of the front cap that is that large, can present some new challenges.   If it is the entire piece from the windshield down, mirrors must be relocated as the movable section would prove unusable due to vibration issues.  This would mean going to the inverted upper mounted units.  That could raise all kinds of new issues.   See January 27th article &#8220;New Innovations Are Not Always Better&#8221;  LINK HERE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feeline</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Feeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>I have the bottom mounted mirrors that I view through the windshield, I find that they present a blind spot at intersections and require me to do a little dance in the seat to see around them at times.

I guess this is a minor problem compared to the fact that you can not use your shades and the glare makes the mirrors useless in certain situations.

I guess the positioning of the mirrors is a tradeoff, you don&#039;t hit your head, but you cann&#039;t use the mirrors for what they were designed.

One step forward, one step back.

Keep up the good work, enjoy the blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the bottom mounted mirrors that I view through the windshield, I find that they present a blind spot at intersections and require me to do a little dance in the seat to see around them at times.</p>
<p>I guess this is a minor problem compared to the fact that you can not use your shades and the glare makes the mirrors useless in certain situations.</p>
<p>I guess the positioning of the mirrors is a tradeoff, you don&#8217;t hit your head, but you cann&#8217;t use the mirrors for what they were designed.</p>
<p>One step forward, one step back.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, enjoy the blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phototex</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>phototex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>I curse my driver&#039;s side inverted mirror just about every time I drive it.  The glare makes it impossible to see.  I only wish there was a way to change them out for traditional, lower-mounted ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I curse my driver&#8217;s side inverted mirror just about every time I drive it.  The glare makes it impossible to see.  I only wish there was a way to change them out for traditional, lower-mounted ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lug_Nut</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Lug_Nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Wayne,  I agree, I also have somewhat adjusted to them as there is little else to do.  As the entire front, up to the windshield, slides out, it is not possible to change to lower mounted due to possible vibration issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne,  I agree, I also have somewhat adjusted to them as there is little else to do.  As the entire front, up to the windshield, slides out, it is not possible to change to lower mounted due to possible vibration issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>I have the high mount mirrors.  While I agree with your evaluation, I have adjusted to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the high mount mirrors.  While I agree with your evaluation, I have adjusted to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob lilienthal</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>bob lilienthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the way things improve is by constantly prying, pushing and prodding.  If one is satisfied, then complacency overcomes achievement, and the mother of invention stays home and bakes pies.  
Bottom line: If it ain&#039;t broke, break it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the way things improve is by constantly prying, pushing and prodding.  If one is satisfied, then complacency overcomes achievement, and the mother of invention stays home and bakes pies.<br />
Bottom line: If it ain&#8217;t broke, break it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steady Eddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steady Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rv.net/2008/01/27/new-innovations-are-not-always-better/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Peter--x2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter&#8211;x2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
